Cyclic photophosphorylation is a process of photosynthetic electron transport where electrons excited by Photosystem I (PSI) do not enter the NADP+ and are reduced to NADPH but are repumped instead of into the plastoquinone pool and are returned to PSI. The resultant pumping across the thylakoid membrane of protons causes the ATP synthase to produce ATP.
In contrast to linear or non-cyclic photophosphorylation, the process does not utilise (or require) Photosystem II (PSII), does not produce oxygen or NADPH, and does not result in the photolytic splitting of water. It produces only ATP, and this quality makes it a significant regulatory mechanism that keeps the chloroplast well supplied with ATP compared to NADPH, allowing it to sustain the Calvin cycle and other metabolic processes.
Cyclic Photophosphorylation location
Cyclic photophosphorylation usually occurs in the stroma, or the unstacked area of the thylakoid membrane. PSI is abundant in such regions, while PSII is scarce or absent.
The segregation assists in the independence of PSI in cyclic electron flow. The spatial distribution of this system in higher plants is such that PSI, ferredoxin (Fd), plastocyanin, and the complex of b6f cytochromes can interact efficiently to achieve electron circulation to the pool of plastoquinone.
The morphology of the PSI in stroma lamellae reveals the evolutionary specialization of plastid differentiation in the effective control of ATP production as environmental conditions vary.
Electron Flow Pathway of Cyclic Photophosphorylation
In Cyclic photophosphorylation, the transport pathway of electrons begins with the absorption of light by PSI when P700 gives the energy to excite the electrons. These energetic electrons are passed on in a cascade to a series of acceptors, including A0(a chlorophyll molecule), A1(a phylloquinone), and the iron-sulfur clusters (Fx, FA, FB). Typically, in linear flow, it is then passed on to ferredoxin (Fd) and is reduced to NADPH via the intermediation of ferredoxin-NADP+reductase (FNR). In cyclic photophosphorylation, however, electrons are not transferred to FNR by ferredoxin. It rather converts them into the plastoquinone pool through two alternative pathways:
The sensitive pathway to PGR5-PGRL1 (Inhibitor antimycin A) is essential in making fast changes in light intensities.
The NDH (NADH dehydrogenase-like) complex pathway, which is a slower and more stable pathway of electron transfer, leads to long-term regulation.
As a result of reduction, plastoquinone (PQH2) transfers electrons into the cytochrome b6f complex, which also pumps protons into the thylakoid lumen. These protons contribute to the proton gradient across the membrane. The electrons are transferred onto plastocyanin (PC) and end up back in P700+ in PSI, and the cycle is complete. This loop affects electron neutrality and assures that light absorbed energy is preserved as a proton motive force that can then be used to synthesize ATP by chemiosmosis.
ATP Yield in a NADPH Independent, Oxygen Independent system
The characteristic feature of cyclic photophosphorylation is the limited content of the obtained energy, which is only in ATP. Since PSII is not used, water splitting does not happen, and therefore, there is no liberation of oxygen. In addition, no NADPH is synthesized because ferredoxin does not reduce NADP+ on this pathway. Such selective synthesis of ATP is significant, as the Calvin cycle and other anabolic reactions of the chloroplast need a relatively higher ATP/NADPH ratio than is available with simple electron transport. That is to say, cyclic photophosphorylation offers a flexible mechanism by which the plant can produce more ATP when the cellular energy demand requires it, and to an extent that working through reducing power does not.
Protein participants in Cyclic Electron Flow
In higher plants, two protein pathways have been recognized:
Proton Gradient Regulation proteins (ion gradient: PGR5-PGRL1 pathway):
PGRL1 (PGR5-like protein 1) together with PGR5 (Proton Gradient Regulation 5) organized a complex that makes ferredoxin to reduce the plastoquinone.
This pathway is fast and efficient during sudden variations in the light intensity.
Studies of mutants (e.g., pgr5 mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana) disrupted in this pathway have demonstrated that PSI is very susceptible to photodamage, particularly when growing in fluctuating light.
NADH complex (NADH dehydrogenase-like complex)
It is homologous to the mitochondrial complex I and catalyzes at a much slower rate. It helps in cyclic flow by donation of electrons in ferredoxin to plastoquinone. It is one of the key stress tolerances in response to both drought and chilling stress, where Calvin cycle activity is decreased.
A combination of these two pathways enables plants to balance their redox state between PSI and supply ATP in a demand-dependent manner.
Why Do Plants Use Cyclic Photophosphorylation?
The key factor that causes plants to use cyclic photophosphorylation is to modulate the ATP/ NADPH ratio. The ATP and NADPH are produced in a fixed ratio (about 1.5 ATP / NADPH) via linear photophosphorylation. The rest (about 3 ATP per 2 molecules of NADPH used) in the Calvin cycle is used in the Calvin cycle. Therefore, in the absence of a further source of ATP, the cycle would bog down. In order to meet the additional energy demand, CEF supplies this ATP but does not produce NADPH.
Also, the cyclic photophosphorylation serves as an aid method to the photoprotection by avoiding over-reduction of the electron transport chain. Under conditions where NADP is limited (low CO2 during drought stress), there is a potential to produce electrons at PSI and cause damage via the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The fact that CEF recaptures electrons and dissipates surplus energy as a proton gradient that can be used safely to generate or wasted as heat through NPQ avoids that happening.
Environmental Stimuli to Cyclic Photophosphorylation
CEF would be predominantly induced when conditions impose a limitation on the Calvin cycle or saturation of electron acceptors downstream of PSI. Such requirements are:
Bright light: sudden light has the potential to rapidly linear electron transport; CEF can balance the ratio of ATP/NADPH.
Drought stress: closure of stomata causes a slowed Calvin cycle by smaller entry of CO2, leading to slower availability of NADP+ +.
Cold stress: enzyme activity in the Calvin cycle is inhibited, but the light reactions that originate at PSI are maintained with CEF protecting PSI.
Stress and PSII damage: The inhibition of PSII partially results in PSI remaining to provide functioning ATP via CEF.
These triggers are indicative of the adaptive significance of CEF to ensure plant survival in variable and stressful environments.
Comparison with Non-cyclic (Linear) Photophosphorylation
Linear (not cyclic) photophosphorylation uses both PSI and PSII, involves the splitting of water, and liberates oxygen and generates both ATP and NADPH. Alternately, cyclic photophosphorylation only uses PSI, does not split water, does not release oxygen, and only makes ATP. The important distinction is then in the products and the participation of PSII. And the usual series of flow, under normal conditions, is the linear flow, although in special circumstances, when extra ATP is needed, or PSI protection is needed, there is also a supplementary cyclic flow. In this way, both pathways are complementary to each other, and due to this, photosynthesis can occur fully in a wide variety of conditions.
Role of Cyclic Photophosphorylation in Photoprotection and PSI Redox Poise
Cyclic photophosphorylation plays a prime role in the redox balance of PSI. Besides the photochemical quenching, production of proton motive force aids non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), in which excess light energy is safely released as heat. This inhibits the generation of reactive oxygen species in PSI. In addition, CEF balances the rate of delivery of electrons to PSI when the Calvin Cycle is suppressed, thereby limiting over-reduction of PSI acceptors, a phenomenon described as PSI photoinhibition. The rate of electron transfer via the cytochrome b6f complex is also under the control of the proton gradient formed, which also helps to stabilize the redox poise.
Experimental Evidence- The fact that cyclic photophosphorylation occurs has been demonstrated in several ways:
Mutant phenotype: In Arabidopsis, pgr5 mutants are extremely light sensitive to variances of illumination, confirming the criticality of the PGR5-dependent CEF.
Inhibitor experiments: The PGR5 pathway can be blocked with antimycin A, and the NDH-mediated CEF pathway is affected with rotenone.
Electrographic shift (ECS) recording: This records the altered membrane potential, which is proportional to proton motive force, showing that CEF brought about proton pumping.
P700 absorbance readings: Following the redox state of PSI to show the cycling of electrons under certain conditions.
Cyclic Photophosphorylation in Cyanobacteria and Algae
Cyclic photophosphorylation is common as well in cyanobacteria and green algae. Several NDH complexes are present in cyanobacteria that usually contribute both to cyclic flow and to the uptake of CO 2. In the model green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, the PGRL1/PGR5 pathway is a leading mechanism used to preserve PSI during high-light and low-light variation. Studies of these organisms lead to valuable insights about CEF because such organisms can live in very harsh or fluctuating light conditions, and this illustrates the evolutionary significance of this process.
Future Prospects of Cyclic Photophosphorylation
Research on cyclic photophosphorylation is currently aimed at the biotechnological development of plants with improved CEF duplex to increase photosynthesis efficiency and stress resistance. The crops could be made more resistant to drought, varying light, and climate change conditions by increasing the supply of ATP. Synthetic biology also aims at designing artificial light-harvesting systems based on CEF, and this could help in bringing space-based agriculture and energy harvesting bioindustry. The regulation can be altered at the genetic level by editing regulatory proteins, e.g., PGR5 or NDH subunits, using genetic technologies such as CRISPR-Cas to facilitate energy allocation in crops.
Conclusion
Cyclic photophosphorylation is an important element in the photosynthesis electron transport chain. Though it only brings forth ATP but not NADPH or oxygen, the role of the pathway is essential to balancing the chloroplast energy budget, the Calvin cycle, and photoprotecting PSI. Flexibility and resilience in photosynthesis are ensured by the CEF, which gives the plants a chance to adapt to environmental stress and variable conditions. Its importance does not lie merely in energy balance but in its fine regulation over time in order to maintain the highly refined photosynthetic machinery in optimal condition in varied habitats.
References
- Munekage, Y., et al. (2004). Cyclic electron flow around photosystem I is essential for photosynthesis. Nature, 429, 579–582. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02598
- Shikanai, T. (2016). Regulation of photosynthetic electron transport and cyclic electron flow. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 67, 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-112002
- Hertle, A. P., et al. (2013). PGRL1 is the ferredoxin–plastoquinone reductase in cyclic electron flow. Nature, 504, 366–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12666
- Kramer, D. M., & Evans, J. R. (2011). The energetics of photosynthesis. Plant Physiology, 155, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.166652
- Pandey, S. N., & Sinha, B. K. (2009). Plant Physiology. Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi.
- Mohapatra, P. K., & Tripathy, B. C. (2014). Teaching the Z-scheme of electron transport in photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research, 122(2), 195–210.
- Admin. (2021, February 23). Cyclic photophosphorylation. BYJUS. https://byjus.com/biology/cyclic-photophosphorylation/
- Ogawa, T., Kobayashi, K., Taniguchi, Y. Y., Shikanai, T., Nakamura, N., Yokota, A., & Munekage, Y. N. (2023). Two cyclic electron flows around photosystem I differentially participate in C4 photosynthesis. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 191(4), 2288–2300. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiad032
- Allen, J. F. (2003). Cyclic, pseudocyclic and noncyclic photophosphorylation: new links in the chain. Trends in Plant Science, 8(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(02)00006-7
- Johnson, G. N. (2010). Physiology of PSI cyclic electron transport in higher plants. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Bioenergetics, 1807(3), 384–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.11.009
